Research Article
Position of Verdict KPPU in Indonesia
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.3-8-2019.2290728, author={N Yolanda}, title={Position of Verdict KPPU in Indonesia}, proceedings={Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Management, Business, Applied Science, Engineering and Sustainability Development, ICMASES 2019, 9-10 February 2019, Malang, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICMASES}, year={2020}, month={1}, keywords={the commission for the supervision of business competition and doubt}, doi={10.4108/eai.3-8-2019.2290728} }- N Yolanda
Year: 2020
Position of Verdict KPPU in Indonesia
ICMASES
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.3-8-2019.2290728
Abstract
The phenomenon has grown and is supported by the presence of associated relations between the decision-makers with the party efforts, either directly or indirectly, that more aggravate in situation. The implementation of national economics lack spur to the mandate of the constitution that is Article 33 UUD 1945, as well as tends to show the pattern of a very monopolistic. The businessmen near with elite authorization get the eases of profuse that impact to asymmetry of social. In the principle of verdict to made CSBC is not bound for parties dispute. Because in formal or normative CSBC is not competent made the verdict and given doubt that is the judiciary. If seen from the verdict remove, that is not included in the verdict condemnatory although the verdict of declarator. Therefore, the writer can be conclusion that position of the verdict removes by CSBC in system Indonesia of the law is not clear and confused. That is not clear because not arrange in distinct by Legislations, confuse because of the verdict can not input in the verdict condemnator although verdict declarator. The verdict to remove by CSBC only character entirely administrative not juridical technical that is verdict institute other outside the court that is verdict P4P, Bapepam, BPSK, institute Arbitration, etc.