Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia

Research Article

Jurisdictional Review of Legal Protection Against Land Rights Owner in The Event of Multiple Certificates

Download250 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315767,
        author={Iqriyah Petta Minnon and Evita Isretno Israhadi},
        title={Jurisdictional Review of Legal Protection Against Land Rights Owner in The Event of Multiple Certificates},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the First Multidiscipline International Conference, MIC 2021, October 30 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={MIC},
        year={2022},
        month={1},
        keywords={dual certificate; legal security; land ownership},
        doi={10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315767}
    }
    
  • Iqriyah Petta Minnon
    Evita Isretno Israhadi
    Year: 2022
    Jurisdictional Review of Legal Protection Against Land Rights Owner in The Event of Multiple Certificates
    MIC
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.30-10-2021.2315767
Iqriyah Petta Minnon1,*, Evita Isretno Israhadi1
  • 1: Universitas Borobudur, Jakarta, Indonesia
*Contact email: iqriyah@yahoo.co.id

Abstract

The endorsement is a letter of confirmation of land freedoms or proof of land privileges guideline which comprises of a duplicate of the land book and an estimating archive bound together in a report cover for the comfort of the right holder concerned. This examination expects to depict the variables that can prompt the development of twin land privileges declarations and investigate the lawful security that land owners have if they have double certificates. The methodology utilized in this exploration is regulating juridical law research, and the kind of examination is library research. The review reasoned that the elements causing double endorsements of land privileges, among others, were specialized blunders during estimation, the presence of a letter of proof or affirmation of freedoms (lie, bogus, or as of now not substantial), land legacy freedoms, and covering in the issuance of land privileges declarations, alluded to as regulatory legalism.