Proceedings of The International Conference on Environmental and Technology of Law, Business and Education on Post Covid 19, ICETLAWBE 2020, 26 September 2020, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Research Article

Strict Liability for Environmental Offenses

Download533 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302586,
        author={Al  Halim and Mahrus  Ali},
        title={Strict Liability for Environmental Offenses},
        proceedings={Proceedings of The International Conference on Environmental and Technology of Law, Business and Education on Post Covid 19, ICETLAWBE 2020, 26 September 2020, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICETLAWBE},
        year={2020},
        month={12},
        keywords={strict liability regulatory offenses administrative dependent of criminal law environmental harm},
        doi={10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302586}
    }
    
  • Al Halim
    Mahrus Ali
    Year: 2020
    Strict Liability for Environmental Offenses
    ICETLAWBE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.26-9-2020.2302586
Al Halim1,*, Mahrus Ali2
  • 1: Doctorate Program Student in Law Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • 2: Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
*Contact email: halim_not@yahoo.co.id

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the rationality and application of strict liability for environmental offenses in the Environmental Protection and Management Act of Indonesia. The strict liability set out in this law expressly applies only to civil cases and covers the possibility that it may be used in criminal matters. Normative legal research complemented by a statutory and conceptual approach was used. The results showed that it generally applies to regulatory offenses aimed at protecting the public interest. This doctrine is necessary to improve the long-term and prevents harm to people or the environment. The absence of mental element proof should be limited to offenses that are characterized by the administrative dependence of criminal law, which is reflected in the abstract and concrete endangerment models. The offense is formulated as formal offense by eliminating the element of the perpetrator’s culpability, and it is therefore not necessary to prove it.