Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education, ICOPE 2020, 16-17 October 2020, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

Research Article

A Comparative-Case Study of Junior High School English Curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines

Download673 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305231,
        author={Rahmawati  Rahmawati and Ridwan  Ridwan and Jonna Mae B Calambro},
        title={A Comparative-Case Study of Junior High School English Curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education, ICOPE 2020, 16-17 October 2020, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICOPE},
        year={2021},
        month={3},
        keywords={curriculum english as a second language (esl) english as a foreign language (efl)},
        doi={10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305231}
    }
    
  • Rahmawati Rahmawati
    Ridwan Ridwan
    Jonna Mae B Calambro
    Year: 2021
    A Comparative-Case Study of Junior High School English Curriculum between Indonesia and the Philippines
    ICOPE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305231
Rahmawati Rahmawati1,*, Ridwan Ridwan1, Jonna Mae B Calambro2
  • 1: Borneo Tarakan University
  • 2: PSU Integrated School-High School
*Contact email: rahmawati2497@gmail.com

Abstract

This study aims to describe the similarities and differences between Indonesian and Filipino English curricula and other special characteristics of the two countries in the ninth grade of junior high school. The comparative case research was conducted in two schools, namely SMP Frater Don Bosco Tarakan and SMA Terpadu PSU which were selected purposively as samples. The data obtained from classroom observations, interviews, and related documents were analyzed qualitatively using concurrent analysis (data sorting, presentation, and conclusion drawing). The Indonesian and Philippine curricula have similarities in terms of aims, objectives, pedagogical standards, and evaluation standards, but differ in learning objects. Some of the specific characteristics of both curriculum practices are taking advantage of today's advanced technology, building responsibility among students, evaluating student attitudes authentically, and moving away from judging academic achievement based on exaggerated grades.