Research Article
Village Political Entrepreneurship: Analysis of the Winner Village Program 'Soetran Awards Trenggalek' Through the Paradigm of Public Value Management
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295137, author={I A Pohan and J Wahyudi}, title={Village Political Entrepreneurship: Analysis of the Winner Village Program 'Soetran Awards Trenggalek' Through the Paradigm of Public Value Management}, proceedings={Proceedings of the First Brawijaya International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, BSPACE, 26-28 November, 2019, Malang, East Java, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={B-SPACE}, year={2020}, month={5}, keywords={political entrepreneurship networked governance paradigm public value management (pvm) soetran awards village}, doi={10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295137} }- I A Pohan
J Wahyudi
Year: 2020
Village Political Entrepreneurship: Analysis of the Winner Village Program 'Soetran Awards Trenggalek' Through the Paradigm of Public Value Management
B-SPACE
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295137
Abstract
The research aims to find out how the paradigm of Public Value Management (PVM) can be tested through the Soetran Awards (SA) winning village’s programs. Also, the study examines whether the Soetran Awards program can classify as a form of Implementation of PVM. The SA program aims to award the villages that have outstanding public service programs. It assesses in 3 categories, namely: First, the implementation of the village government; Second, the village economic development; Lastly is the development of the village. During this time, studies discussing public service from the perspective of PVM are still limited. The study used a qualitative approach with a case-study method. Data obtained through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, as well as written and printed documents. Data analyzed using interactive analysis and evaluated the new paradigm of public service governance, PVM. It found that of 5 SA-winning villages that being research objects, none of the villages in the planning and implementing of the program can fulfill all indicators in PVM. Each village has its strengths and disadvantages in a PVM paradigm perspective. However, the five villages were able to determine the objective of the village problem, which formulated into a program to solve the problems or challenges faced by the village. At the same time, almost all villages do not have a precise mechanism or way of being able to interpret what has become public interest.