Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies (formerly ICCSSIS), ICCSIS 2019, 24-25 October 2019, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia

Research Article

Development of African History-Based Multiculturalism for Historical Education Students

Download408 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.24-10-2019.2290631,
        author={Abdul Haris Nasution and Flore  Tanjung and Arfan  Diansyah},
        title={Development of African History-Based Multiculturalism for Historical Education Students},
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences and Interdisciplinary Studies (formerly ICCSSIS), ICCSIS 2019, 24-25 October 2019, Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ICSSIS},
        year={2019},
        month={12},
        keywords={teaching materials african history multiculturalism},
        doi={10.4108/eai.24-10-2019.2290631}
    }
    
  • Abdul Haris Nasution
    Flore Tanjung
    Arfan Diansyah
    Year: 2019
    Development of African History-Based Multiculturalism for Historical Education Students
    ICSSIS
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.24-10-2019.2290631
Abdul Haris Nasution1,*, Flore Tanjung1, Arfan Diansyah1
  • 1: Universitas Negeri Medan, North Sumatera, Indonesia
*Contact email: abdharisnasution@unimed.ac.id

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop African history teaching materials based on multiculturalism for historical education students. Data collection is done using polls, observations, and interviews. The teaching materials are developed using the Borg and Gall models grouped in four stages, namely preliminary study, development, field test, dissemination and dissemination of products. Assessment of the 4.14 material members included in the good category and the assessment of the 4.07 media experts included in the good criteria. Student assessments in limited field test stages, wider field tests, and operational tests of 4.19 respectively; 4.26; and 4.14. The value 4.19 in field trials are included in the good criteria, the value of 4.26 in the broader field test is included in excellent criteria, and the value 4.14 in the operational test is included in the good criteria.