Research Article
Criminal Liability for a Notary Committing a Criminal Act of Fraud in Parallel in the Land Sector
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.21-9-2018.2281131, author={Hadimastika Karsito Putro and I Made Sepud and I Made Arjaya}, title={Criminal Liability for a Notary Committing a Criminal Act of Fraud in Parallel in the Land Sector}, proceedings={Proceedings of International Conference of Social Science, ICOSS 2018, Denpasar, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICOSS}, year={2019}, month={1}, keywords={criminal act fraud liability notary parallel}, doi={10.4108/eai.21-9-2018.2281131} }- Hadimastika Karsito Putro
I Made Sepud
I Made Arjaya
Year: 2019
Criminal Liability for a Notary Committing a Criminal Act of Fraud in Parallel in the Land Sector
ICOSS
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.21-9-2018.2281131
Abstract
The study reports the application of the Material Criminal Law by the Public Prosecutor against perpetrators of fraudulent offenses, especially notaries, with a decision number: 207/pid.b/2014/pn. This type of study is normative study. The results indicate that to achieve material truth by the Panel of Judges of the State District Court is conducted by carefully examining all the acts, events or circumstances that took place during the trial where the facts were extracted from the evidence in the form of witnesses, statements of the defendant and evidence. Apparently these correspond to one another so that it is believed that the actions of the suspect constituted a criminal act that intentionally helped to commit fraud, so that the act violates the provisions of Article 378 in conjunction with Article 65 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and the judge sentences the defendants for 2-year imprisonment.