Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar of Public Health and Education, ISPHE 2020, 22 July 2020, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia

Research Article

Indonesian Pencak Silat Athletes Management

Download423 downloads
  • @INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.22-7-2020.2300289,
        author={Lesmana  Lesmana and Tatang  Muhtar and Nurlan  Kusmaedi and Adli  Hakama},
        title={Indonesian Pencak Silat Athletes Management },
        proceedings={Proceedings of the 5th International Seminar of Public Health and Education, ISPHE 2020, 22 July 2020, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia},
        publisher={EAI},
        proceedings_a={ISPHE},
        year={2020},
        month={9},
        keywords={management pencak silat achievement},
        doi={10.4108/eai.22-7-2020.2300289}
    }
    
  • Lesmana Lesmana
    Tatang Muhtar
    Nurlan Kusmaedi
    Adli Hakama
    Year: 2020
    Indonesian Pencak Silat Athletes Management
    ISPHE
    EAI
    DOI: 10.4108/eai.22-7-2020.2300289
Lesmana Lesmana1,*, Tatang Muhtar1, Nurlan Kusmaedi1, Adli Hakama1
  • 1: Indonesia University of Education
*Contact email: ikalesmana1612@gmail.com

Abstract

Researches concerning the implementation of coaching management and how the relationship of management to achievement were needed. This research uses a de-scriptive method with a quantitative approach. The sample used in this study was the Pencak Silat national team at the 2017 Sea Games 2017 and the 2018 Asian Games, totaling 30 athletes. The instrument used in this research was a question-naire based on management theory from Bucher and Krotee. The results showed the team management with an overall average score of 173.13 entered in good cat-egory. The most prominent in the team management was controlling with a score of 132.43, followed by organizing, staffing with each an average score of 128.57 and 128.22. There was a significant and positive relationship be-tween management and team achievements. Overall management contributed 66.3% in determining the success of team achievements. Whereas based on the indicators, the biggest contributors were staffing indicators (71.2%).