Research Article
Juridical Review Of The Judge's Decision In The Credit Agreement Decision (Case Study Of Decision Case Number 40 / Pdt.G / 2019 / Pn.Mdn)
@INPROCEEDINGS{10.4108/eai.14-4-2021.2312878, author={Said Rizal and Veronika Veronika and Yosua Christian Harefa and Cicilia Abigael Valmaru Sitinjak and Gabryel Radella Septani Purba}, title={Juridical Review Of The Judge's Decision In The Credit Agreement Decision (Case Study Of Decision Case Number 40 / Pdt.G / 2019 / Pn.Mdn)}, proceedings={Proceedings from the 1st International Conference on Law and Human Rights, ICLHR 2021, 14-15 April 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia}, publisher={EAI}, proceedings_a={ICLHR}, year={2021}, month={10}, keywords={credit default lawsuit}, doi={10.4108/eai.14-4-2021.2312878} }- Said Rizal
Veronika Veronika
Yosua Christian Harefa
Cicilia Abigael Valmaru Sitinjak
Gabryel Radella Septani Purba
Year: 2021
Juridical Review Of The Judge's Decision In The Credit Agreement Decision (Case Study Of Decision Case Number 40 / Pdt.G / 2019 / Pn.Mdn)
ICLHR
EAI
DOI: 10.4108/eai.14-4-2021.2312878
Abstract
As for the definition of credit listed in Article 1 Number 11 UU No10/1998 concerning Banking: "That credit is the provision of money or bills that can be equated with it, based on the agreement and loan agreement between the bank and other parties that oblige the borrower to pay off his debt after a certain period of time with interest". How is the juridical analysis of the judge's consideration of rejecting the lawsuit in the verdict case 40 / Pdt.G / 2019/2019 / PN. The method of data collection used in the writing of this thesis is through document study and library research method. Data analysis uses qualitative methods that produce descriptive analytical data. Based on the consideration of the Panel of Judges against the lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff with the legal facts revealed in the trial, the Panel of Judges who adjudicate this case states that the lawsuit should be a "resistance" to the process of selling the auction of aset of plaintiffs due to bad credit conducted by Defendant I with the help of Defendant II.